Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 921 - 940
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BINGUE v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Petitioner Mark Janus is a state employee whose unit is represented by a public-sector union (Union), one of the respondents. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm
Ferencz Matiangai Sirleaf, Rendering Whiteness Visible International Decisions Julien Chaisse & Kehinde Folake Olaoye, United States—Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/R Faith O. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
” United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart must have felt equal frustration when trying to define “obscenity. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:33 am
Case date: 10 March 2021 Case number: No. 20-10785 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 5:39 am
Case date: 17 July 2024 Case number:No. 23-1609 and No. 23-1705 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design… [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
See Diamond Hong, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog] Other United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:04 pm
In the now-famous/infamous case Pequignot v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:54 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:31 pm
I had missed United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 12:40 pm
Mark v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
Brittex Financial v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:23 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm
United States, 810 F.3d 1333, 1347 (Fed. [read post]
