Search for: "United States v. Powers"
Results 921 - 940
of 20,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Newman & Biddulph on Post-Sibelius Comparative Spending Power Law in the U.S., Canada, and Australia
13 Sep 2012, 8:44 am
Here is the abstract: This article examines the spending power dimension of the recent United States Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act from the unique perspective of situating it within a comparativist analysis alongside Canadian and Australian approaches to a federal spending power. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:30 pm
Health-care federalism in the United States--the division of power between the federal and state governments in the regulation of health care--although at times beneficial, too frequently exacerbates health disparities. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
The post The Sackett Oral Argument and the Problem of Defining "Waters of the United States" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:57 pm
See, Chevron USA Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
United States, however, recognized an exception for cases in which a nonmember enters a contract or other consensual commercial relationship with a tribe or its members. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
To be sure, those loyal to the United States, regardless of race, needed protection for their civil rights. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
The tenth amendment provides: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
As the United States is a party to these instruments, it must address the activities of vulture funds that violate the rights enshrined in them. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
The founding generation understood the phrase "Officers of the United States" to refer to officers exercising the powers of the National Government, not officers solely exercising Article IV territorial power. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:09 pm
United States (1983). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
The Ninth Circuit today decided in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Medellin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:02 pm
Ilya Shapiro (of the Cato Institute) has an interesting post discussing the upcoming Supreme Court argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Justice Viviano’s concurring and dissenting opinion explicitly calls for “adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States” (p 29 of his opinion). [read post]
