Search for: "United States v. Rogers & Rogers" Results 921 - 940 of 1,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm by Lara
Roger Cleveland v Prince Judgment(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Randolph thus reversed the district judge’s ruling ordering the release of the petitioners—seventeen Uighur refugees from China—into the United States when the government failed to justify their detention or resettle them elsewhere. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
United States, and Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am by Florian Mueller
Then the focus is on whether Apple abuse its aftermarket monopoly.I've previously explained in detail why Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California got the law, the economics, and the technology wrong with respect to the foremarket part. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Nicola Rogers was instructed by Shelter for Mrs Ibrahim. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
Rogers, in which the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment does not automatically require a state to provide counsel to indigent litigants facing a civil contempt proceeding. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in a 6 to 3 opinion yesterday that Aereo’s Internet retransmission service infringes copyright. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Robert Chesney
(See also this report by the New York Times, stating that frustration along these same lines contributed to the effort to get President Obama to remove Admiral Rogers in late 2016.) [read post]
26 May 2012, 7:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Related to this issue is whether a defendant can collaterally attack a statute, introducing evidence from the family court [on issues of payment history, income levels and availability of funds] into a court of general jurisdiction: i.e. the Oakland County Circuit Court.One more recent development since that post is last June's SCOTUS decision in Turner v Rogers, holding that a child support payor facing incarceration for non-payment is afforded legal counsel under the… [read post]