Search for: "United States v. That Certain Real Property"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:19 pm
But the real issue is whether it's reasonable to expect an infringer to either take a license (if the patent holder offers one) or to work around (or "design around") an intellectual property right. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland and the United Kingdom both submitted third-party comments in TV Vest v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
Next, the Board overruled Petitioner City's objection to a certain third-party publication downloaded from the Internet, ruling that under Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:38 am
Yesterday the United States International Trade Commission tossed whatever little was left (one patent only) of Motorola's complaint against Apple. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
Al., Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Conveyance of real property -- Limitation of actions -- Where agreement between school board and property owner clearly and unambiguously required owner to deed to school board by a specified date forty acres of land meeting certain outlined conditions, owner breached the agreement on the specified date when owner failed to deed a compliant forty-acre parcel to the school board -- Statute of limitations not tolled by… [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
(2) against any person or property within the United States, and . . . . [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
(2) against any person or property within the United States, and . . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:03 am
Apple says that damages-only retrials, such as in Uniloc v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:42 pm
Actually, in May v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Since then, at least in the United States, the general partnership has been largely supplanted by other, statutorily enabled business forms providing limited liability, namely, corporations and, more recently, limited liability companies. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:56 am
The post-trial, post-damages-ruling procedures in the first Apple v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
He threw out Motorola's demands and laid out certain criteria for SEP-based damages. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:50 pm
Legislation BulletinThree new bills were added:1) S.385 - A bill to deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service contracting officer as timely.2) H.R.841 - To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act to make technical corrections, and for other purposes.3) S.402 - To provide for the addition of certain real property to the reservation of the Siletz Tribe in the State of Oregon. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
In my post about Prenda Law's defamation lawsuits, I mentioned that Prenda is facing an inquiry by United States District Judge Otis Wright in Los Angeles. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The statute set up certain procedures and certain tribunals through which the federal government has to go in order to be allowed to monitor and intercept electronic communications involving persons outside the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
The real reason is gamesmanship. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has dredged up an old Kentucky opinion from 2003, United State v. [read post]
