Search for: "United States v. White"
Results 921 - 940
of 7,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 4:26 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken has told his Ukrainian counterpart that this progress — marked by Kyiv Embassy charge d’affaires Kristina Kvien’s visit yesterday to commemorate V-E Day — is a testament to Ukraine’s success and Moscow’s failure in the early phase of the war. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:08 pm
In addition, these bans would have disproportionate racial effects, as the likelihood of Black women dying at the hands of pregnancy and delivery-related complications in the United States is three to four times higher than that of white women. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:26 pm
The EU shall also contribute to the strict observance and the development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter. [read post]
6 May 2022, 12:23 pm
Steven Oroho said it’s unbelievable that the Biden White House refused to condemn the online posting of the home addresses of United States Supreme Court justices for planned protests. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:44 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Gilead does not include the entirety of what used to be the United States, but that aspect of the story is not pertinent to this discussion. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
" MICHAEL OMI & HOWARD WINANT, RACIAL FORMATION IN THE UNITED STATES 122 (3d ed. 2015); see also PETER H. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:27 am
Supreme Court cases, Moe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
If it becomes clear that sanctions will not induce compliance, they must cease (although “civil” confinement for disobedience of a state court’s order once lasted 14 years). [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In one of the flashbacks that give viewers bits and pieces of the story of the collapse of the old United States and the emergence of Gilead, two of the m [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am
In the balance of today's essay, I'll discuss a hypothesis first floated by Professor Stephen Vladeck and reported by the NY Times last month: perhaps the Biden administration is hoping that once the mandate expires of its own force (as it will tomorrow), the case will be moot; then, invoking the Munsingwear mootness doctrine (named for the 1950 SCOTUS case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm
As a result, the United States Supreme Court now protects free speech more vigorously than any other judiciary in the world. [read post]
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
” This rule was applied in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
” The White House press release has further information here. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am
” The battlespace in Syria was messy before the United States intervened. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
Real USFL, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
