Search for: "Wall v. State of California" Results 921 - 940 of 1,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 806 S.W.2d 608, 613 (Ark. 1991).California: Carlin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
The Court held that this was unconstitutional in the unusual case of United States v Alvarez (11-2010 06/28/12), in which a local official in California had claimed to have been awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, when he had not even undertaken military service. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:00 am by Chad Wiener
 In September 2010, a new decision was handed down in the case, United States of America v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:37 am by Jeff Welty
My understanding is that municipalities moved away from them after Shavitz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit striking down a California law that restricts permits to carry handguns, Michael Kirkland of UPI looks at the prospect that the Court will weigh in; at Wall Street Cheat Sheet, Meghan Foley discusses comments by retired Justice John Paul Stevens on the Court’s Second Amendment jurisprudence. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Further, state law could allow a corporation to indemnify a director or officer. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Wall-Street.com, 17-571 (copyright). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:10 am by David J. DePaolo
  In California, a recent Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel opinion imposed the maximum statutory penalty against a carrier for what it said was an unreasonable delay in the approval of psychotropic medications for an injured worker.In Ferro v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations: aspects of German and European woes… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations: aspects of German and European woes… [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The National Law Review has posted on California’s recent amendment to defamation privilege laws, extending the doctrine to cover communications related to sexual harassment claims and investigations. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Econsultancy had a post “European Data Protection Board: cookie walls, scrolling aren’t sufficient for GDPR consent”. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 4:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The officers stated that they ordered Rollice to stop, but he grabbed a hammer from the back wall over the workbench and turned around to face the officers. [read post]