Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 4,951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers' Jurisdictional Determination ("JD") that the property under review was a wetland that constitutes "waters of the United States" and thereby subject to the permitting and enforcement authority of the Corps, can be reviewed by the federal courts on an immediate basis. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:55 am
The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) is reporting that the Obama Administration filed a brief with the United States Supreme Court opposing a petition by those in the agricultural industry asking the high court to reconsider a 2009 decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 10:44 am by Native American Rights Fund
Stidham (tribal election dispute, jurisdiction)    * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Idaho v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 10:38 am by National Indian Law Library
Nemaha Brown Watershed Joint District No.7 (water rights)Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Oil and Gas Drilling Permits)United States of America v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am by Unknown
United States Department of the Interior (Oil and Gas Drilling Permits)United States of America v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Farmers were among leading opponents of 2015 WOTUS (Waters of the United States) rule, and for good reason [Lawrence A. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:00 am by Hennadiy Kutsenko
Critique As stated, the views above may not necessarily be correct in law. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:56 am by Sumter Camp
" Derrick Johnson would agree, but, unfortunately, the majority didn’t agree with Justice Scalia, and the Sixth Circuit didn't agree with Derrick Johnson.The issue in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:18 am by Unknown
United States (Monetary Damages; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Dan Hoerner
The United States Supreme Court addresses only about one percent of the cases brought before it. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:19 pm
Under that Act, no one may discharge pollutants into “navigable waters,” defined as “the waters of the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:35 pm by Unknown
Forest County Potawatomi Community (Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]