Search for: "Way v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 59,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or indirectly… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 8:25 pm
OiOI Although in a less spectacular way that in some other oral arguments, yesterday’s oral argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
Abbott, and No. 08-1200, Jerman v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:41 am
State Farm promised post-judgment motions in Broussard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:30 am
DN’s attempt to assist unlawful immigration to a member state country was a serious offence by way of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Specification of Particularly Serious Crimes) Order 2004. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:56 am
Recently the United States Supreme Court decided, in the case of Sessions v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
With its cert grant in Texas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
In turn, Max Mosley v News Group Newspapers, is a prime example of a claimant not having advanced knowledge prior to publication and therefore being unable to prevent publication.The basis of Max Mosley v UK is best summarised by Dominic Crossley (Steeles Law LLP) stating:“…although we all have a right to privacy, it is entirely up to the editor of a newspaper whether or not we are able to exercise that right in any effective or meaningful way. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:17 am
Before I end my blog holiday and come back from New York, I thought you might just be slightly interested in this US Supreme Court case showing that non-discriminatory inter-state commerce is protected in a way analogous to (thought different from, obviously) free movement law in the EU. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:39 am
” Katz-Crank v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
Last week, the Supreme Court decided a case involving a state employee who sued for violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Coleman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:53 pm
Mandy writes: The case, Rahman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:31 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am
A room at the George V in Paris is going to cost you big time, but then, you knew that going in and chose to run up such a tab. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to render an opinion in Hadden v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
As a result, dozens of cases challenging surveillance have been making their way through the courts. [read post]
