Search for: "Willis v. Willis"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:24 am
Seng-Tiong Ho v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
(RT: And the existence of entities motivated to make it fail, pace Lauren Willis!) [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
Vanhorn v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
But, as explained in Counterman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
For those who haven’t seen it: Wonka is essentially the origin story of the Willy Wonka from 1971’s Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
See, I thought I'd be writing today about two of the odder legal quests of recent years: The judge who sued his dry cleaner for $54 million (yes, you read that right) after it lost a pair of his pants, lost at trial, and lost again in the court of appeals (story here, opinion here);The tax lawyer who failed to convince either the New York courts or the federal Tax Court to allow him to deduct as medical expenses $100,000 for prostitutes and pornography (story here, opinion here).But the news… [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
For example, there is a federal case named Henderson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
For example, in 1847, showing a healthy suspicion for principles developed in the ecclesiastical courts and the Star Chamber, Australians came up with the defence of triviality, a defence drawn from Australia’s convict past, where nobody had much of a reputation – or, as Rich J more diplomatically put it, “to meet the hard conditions of pioneer days” (Lang v Willis (1934) 52 CLR 637 at 650). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
HAWSCT Opinions Hamilton v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 5-Star v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
Ybarra v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
” [via FindLaw] Willie James Hodges v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Johnson & Johnson [2010] EWCA Civ 1039 (IPKat) (EPLAW) Breaking news: Willy the Wizard v Harry Potter to go to full trial (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Rules for calculation of time periods measured in months (Patentology) Copyright Tribunal ‘small merger announced: not much change’ (1709 Blog) Costs: Amsterdam ‘nearer Newport’ than other parts of UK, rules IPO: Loadhog Ltd v Polymer Logistics BV (PatLit) The PCC page, no.1: ‘All change at the… [read post]
