Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 9381 - 9400 of 32,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2019] UKSC 22), deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) that purports to exclude from challenge or appeal any decision of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (“IPT”), does not prevent a judicial… [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
However, this does not mean that the average worker is not also burdened by these taxes. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:00 am by Jeremy Raynolds, Writer, EduBirdie
All this information is based on an exhaustive list of 13 core methods. 1. [read post]
22 May 2019, 1:18 am by Tessa Shepperson
It has been suggested that ground 8 be changed to make the rent arrears 4 weeks or 1 month (as opposed to 8 weeks and 2 months as now) but give tenants a longer notice period – say 4 weeks/ 1 month to clear them before proceedings can be issued. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:28 pm by Rob Robinson
For additional information on the transaction, see Pivotal’s website at www.pivotalac.com and Pivotal’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which will be filed promptly and which can be obtained on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website (http://www.sec.gov). [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm by Caroline Lee
  Rather, the Sixth Circuit’s decision binds only federal courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.13 Accordingly, California public agencies remain free to argue that that the decision was wrongly decided because (1) chalking does not constitute a “search” and (2) chalking is reasonable as a matter of law even if it constitutes a search. 1. [read post]
”16 The legislation does not define “software as a service” or “computer software applications. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:03 am
Cir. 2003).Acquired distinctiveness may overcome a Section 2(e)(3) refusal, provided that the mark became distinctive prior to enactment of the NAFTA Implementation Act on December 8, 1993. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The legal source would be Article 15(g) of the Rome II Regulation, which provides that the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, in this case Article 8(1), shall govern liability for the acts of another person. [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:53 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
NHAI [Civil Appeal No. 4779/2019 dt. 8 May 2019]  is significant for several reasons and one of the important reasons is because it lays down the contours of setting aside arbitral awards on the grounds of public policy and patent illegality post the 2015 amendments. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:37 pm
Section 153(1) does not apply if a trustee is appointed in the will. [read post]
In any event, it appears that Mueller does not share Barr’s view that facially valid uses of Article II (whatever those are exactly) can never be treated as criminal. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:24 am by IPWatchdog
In an 8-1 decision, the Court held that the rejection of an executory contract during bankruptcy has the same effect as breach of that contract outside of bankruptcy and thus cannot rescind rights previously granted by the contract. [read post]