Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 11,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma &;amp; Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy… [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
There has been much litigation both in California and on the federal level concerning the enforceability of class action waivers, the most recent important decision being that of the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
As to fraudulent joinder argument, the defendants argued that the claims against McKesson were preempted under PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
Canada In the case of Sole Cleaning Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
A foreign private adviser is any investment adviser who (1) has no place of business in the United States; (2) has fewer than 15 clients and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the adviser; (3) has aggregate assets under management attributable to clients in the United States and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the investment adviser of less than $25 million; and (4) does not… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
NY Pizza & Pasta, Inc., 956 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), which cited Blodgett v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
The plaintiff in Expensify, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
ePlus v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Heller in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
See, e.g., Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of &;lsquo;lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional &;lsquo;child’: Mont… [read post]
