Search for: "I v. B" Results 9381 - 9400 of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2010, 8:52 am by Ray Dowd
It concluded not only that Bauer had been “preoccup[ied] with collateral issues and frivolous discovery disputes” during the course of the litigation, Bauer v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:45 am by Stephen Fairley
” In the past I’ve talked about the 15 percenters—the 15% of the population that always and only buys on price. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Revokey McRevokeface for McDonalds McMark Supermac's v McDonald's Cancellation no. 14787C, EUIPO (July 2019) I covered an earlier chapter of this burger battle in Volume V, in which poor evidence led to the loss of a BIG MAC EU trade mark registration. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:24 am by MBettman
No. 80 Sec. 3(B)(1) (“In enacting section 2305.131 of the Revised Code in this act, it is the intent of the General Assembly . . . [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:14 pm
The case is 134 Original, New Jersey v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm by admin
  With respect to freedom of expression, while the Bureau conceded that the performance claims provision of the Competition Act infringed section 2(b) of the Charter, the Court upheld section 2(b) under section 1. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am by SHG
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 12:02 pm by Nasseri Legal
Ancak, bu makinelerin maliyeti, kumarhanelerin bütçelerine ve müşteri kitlelerine göre değişebilir. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
That is contrary to the judgment of Ward LJ in Manchester CC v Finn (2002] EWCA Civ 1998, (2003] HLR 41; and the observations of Lord Neuberger in Knowsley Housing Trust v White (2008] UKHL 70, (2009] 1 AC 636 (both of which I cite below). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Leave to amend a pleading is freely given absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay (CPLR 3025 [b]). [read post]