Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 9381 - 9400 of 88,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2014, 10:05 am by Christine Swanick and Wilda Wahpepah
  The legal dispute concerns IGRA’s so-called remedial provisions, which require tribes to negotiate Tribal-State Compacts in order to operate Class III gaming. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Brinig, Two Treatments of Pluralism: Canada and the United States, (Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 1517, June 2015).Margaret F. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:44 am by Joel R. Brandes
At the time Respondent retained A.F.A. in the United States, he and Petitioner were still (and remain) legally married. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today called for the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Archdiocese of San Juan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The NCC's podcast on "The Constitutional Legacy of Watergate" is here.Lawbook Exchange’s August 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History is here.Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman explain What [They] Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:44 am by Christine Corcos
We’re going to have the opportunity to hear about the road to Tanco v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
We’re going to have the opportunity to hear about the road to Tanco v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:45 pm by Kathryn Rubino
v=yWP6Qki8mWc * Yup, this is how the President of the United States used his Twitter account in 2017. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
… in AM & S Europe v Commission, … 41. the Court stated that the protection [of legal privilege] was subject to two cumulative conditions. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 3:54 pm
Documents of interest related to this talk: The background info on Al Haramain v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeal held in the Luther v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
The Oregon State Bar adopted a rule making itself the sole legal provider of malpractice insurance for the state’s lawyers. [read post]