Search for: "State v. Price" Results 9381 - 9400 of 13,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
  The other significant restriction carves out stuff "(v) resulting from changes in the market price or trading volume of the Company's securities or from the failure of the Company to meet internal or public projections, forecasts or estimates". [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:51 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Must the mediation agreement itself state that it deals with the fairness of something, such as price? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Spicy IP), US: Who’s to blame for rising drug prices? [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
As in the United States, pre-merger integration, coordination and/or information sharing is an important antitrust issue under Canada's Competition Act. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Law is in part sensitive to the probability of fraud here.Q: often sees calculations of actual price compared to but-for price—but what is the but-for price? [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Further, it might be right that wine is associated with luxury and goods like olive oil (class 29) are “mass-consumed”, but I’ve just checked and Aldi’s lowest priced wine comes in at £3.69 a bottle (49p per 100ml). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:06 am
              Currently, California Dental Association v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am by Eric
Price, potentially exposing SEOs/web designers to secondary liability as well [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: District Court C D California: another victory for Web 2.0, transcoding doesn’t block ‘safe harbor’ defence:  Universal Music Group v Veoh (EFF), (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) (Out-Law) Apple ditches DRM; gives record labels variable iTunes pricing… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm by Kelly
Nahum (IP Law Blog) District Court S D New York: Amazon isn’t liable for rogue affiliate’s keyword ad buys: Sellify v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]