Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 40,668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
Cai v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
” In Nixon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:06 pm
Roth won in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
This term, the Court will hear argument from IJ's educational choice team in Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 11:20 am
Following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
[5] Fiers v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
" Associated Newspapers have stated that they "categorically deny that the duchess's letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:44 pm
In McPherson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:49 am
This interpretation gives full effect to every word in the second clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
Flook and Diamond v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:43 am
His decision in People v. [read post]
