Search for: "US v. John Doe" Results 9381 - 9400 of 11,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
Does this show that something is not working in the system? [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:16 am by Lyle Denniston
  (In the 1977 decision in Marks v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:43 am by Ray Beckerman
It appears that the new cases are employing the very same tactics used by the RIAA in illegally joining large numbers of John Does in the same case, and moving ex parte (without notice) for discovery. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am by Sam E. Antar
Originally, the investors sued InterOil, Mulacek, and Nikiski Partners, which is controlled by Mulacek (Todd Peters, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966); PharamStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:08 am by Lyle Denniston
  Even as the Court was moving towards its decision in Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:24 am
This reality is aptly illustrated by a recent case out of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Horvath v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm by Fred Abrams
  His "Form A's" seem to have been disclosed to the IRS as a result of the tax information exchange agreements expressly mentioned by the settlement in The "John Doe" Summons Case. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by LindaMBeale
Swiss banking:   BNA reports that the Swiss president expects parliament to approve the August 2009 US-Swiss agreement on UBS accounts, which is necessary to prevent the US from reopening the John Doe proceedings against the  bank and seek details on all 45,000 accounts under threat of taking away the license permitting UBS to operate in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:47 am by Jon Hyman
– from The Word on Employment Law with John Phillips The Importance of Statistical Evidence - Randall v Rolls Royce – from Stephanie R. [read post]