Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
The two-day conferencegathered the intellectual acumen of many academic and professional leaders from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Macau, mainland China, Netherlands, Singapore, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States, to name but a few. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
We also have a controlled study in the United States relating to recognizing that strong patents rights spur economic growth and innovations that create new industries. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:17 am
Aptos Council v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 10:29 am
One case frequently cited against the legitimacy of Whitaker’s appointment is NLRB v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
From Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
Background The case now before the Supreme Court, BP PLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
” Winters v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
V). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm
On 23 December 2003, both parties' applications for temporary custody were denied and an injunction was issued prohibiting either party from taking the children out of the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
However, this subsection shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Florida. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Given the United States’ well-documented (and sordid) experience with public-utility regulation, that’s probably not a good idea. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
