Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 9381 - 9400
of 10,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
"Joneca believed that another company had prior rights to the mark in the United states, and when that company let its U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962), that the antitrust laws are designed to protect competition, not competitors). [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
S. 989 (1982), approved in NLRB v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:13 pm
Google, Inc., reversing the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York’s dismissal of Rescuecom’s complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a valid claim for relief. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
See Lane Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
Discussion of the bill begins at the 45:40 mark.) [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:32 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
(quotation and alteration marks omitted). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:33 pm
” It added: “While [they] understandably do not wish to be released to their home country, the fact that the United States has yet to identify an appropriate alternative country to taked them does not mean that the government is in violation of the Court’s order. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Ko`olau pali at Kane`ohe Bay (koolaupokohcc.org) In its recent decision in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:50 am
Later, in Gilmer v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
