Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 9381 - 9400 of 24,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Oakhurst Dairy et al, the United States Court of Appeals decided that the absence of an Oxford comma in a statute was the critical element of its decision. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:48 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Llano life insurance agents need to know about this case from the United States 5th Circuit. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
Jack Geiger, a founder of the community health center model: “The irony is that these states that are rejecting Medicaid expansion — many of them Southern — are the very places where the concentration of poverty and lack of health insurance are the most acute . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project – Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project - Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In Canada, Australia, England and the United States[x], law schools responded to this opportunity. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” He went on to declare, “I think we ought to go back to the first one and go all the way, which is what I wanted to do in the first place. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am by John Bellinger
"   The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the district court to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to show whether “some of the activity underlying their ATS claim took place in the United States. [read post]