Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 9401 - 9420 of 48,946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
On Dec. 17 and Dec. 19, 2019, and Jan. 8 of this year, speaking from the Senate floor, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made the case that the Trump impeachment was setting a “toxic” and “nightmarish” precedent “deeply damaging to the institutions of American government. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:59 am by SHG
That Judge Duncan wrote the majority opinion might be explained by his assuming an “expertise” in such issues, much as Justice Harry Blackmun was tasked with writing Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:33 pm by Kevin Kaufman
The sponsors of the bill, Bill Ferguson (D) and Thomas V. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Dirk v Toews, 2020 ABQB 16 (CanLII) [2] Costs are in the discretion of the trial judge but must be assessed on a principled basis. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
Many Canadians wanted to see the American ads, which always have a lot of hype, given the cost and effort put into them by American advertisers. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm by admin
If your claim is successful, you may be awarded back pay, liquidated damages (of up to two-times the amount of wages owed) as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But there is a twist to this case, as demonstrated below.The case is Sirios v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Hardison opining that “undue hardship” simply means something more than a “de minimis cost” should be disavowed or overruled. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am by Marty Lederman
:  I wouldn't ordinarily say this about an interlocutory appeal without any coercive decree, but I think that in this idiosyncratic situation the Court ought to grant the petitions (and thus the motions to expedite) because of the stratagem that two judges on the Fifth Circuit employed here and the foreseeable effects their manipulations will have.As I noted at the top, the Fifth Circuit panel did two indefensible things.First, it held that Section 5000A of the ACA, as amended in 2017, is… [read post]