Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 9401 - 9420 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with an appeal following the refusal of an application by the Examining Division, based on A 54 and A 52(4).Claims 1, 24, 27, and 33 before the Board read :1. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:29 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
And sadly, at the age of 27, her body simply couldn’t take it any more. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:09 pm by Alex Gasser
Further to our June 27, 2011 post, on July 22, 2011, the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) issued the public version of its opinion affirming, on modified grounds, ALJ Carl C. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
The Engagement Letter, which was dated “As of August 1, 2007? [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
The term an appeal does not restrict it to only one appeal in the High Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the requirement of Rule 27(1)(e) EPC 1973 is not met. [2.4] It follows that the main request and the auxiliary request 2 are not allowable. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff begins his affidavit in support of the motion by stating, in ¶ 1, "I Alexander Breytman the last of the Mohicans have chutzpah to make this affidavit in support and against dishonorable Arthur M. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:53 am by Kim Krawiec
  As you can see from Table 1, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs met with federal agencies most frequently on the Volcker Rule, with 27, 13, and 12 meetings, respectively. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:47 am by Kim Krawiec
  As you can see from Table 1, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs met with federal agencies most frequently on the Volcker Rule, with 27, 13, and 12 meetings, respectively. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This clearly follows from R 84(1) according to which the opposition proceedings may be continued only at the request of the opponent if the European patent has been surrendered in all the designated contracting states or has lapsed in all those states.This is why the Board concludes that “the same patent” [French version : ce brevet] within the meaning of A 105(1)(a) is a European patent within the meaning of A 2(1) EPC 1973, i.e. a patent granted under the… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:02 pm by Jonathan Bailey
The List is a MessThe fact it takes some registrations so long to appear is interesting because all the Copyright Office does is take the mailed in form, scan it and put a link to it on their site.Their index is nothing but a series of 27 pages, one for each letter of the alphabet and one for numerals, that contain links to the relevant PDFs. [read post]