Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 11,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 5:26 pm
Viacom and—separately—the English Premier League sued YouTube and Google alleging that they were liable for infringing works that users posted on YouTube. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
In Dillon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:56 am
As Jay noted here, Holder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In Flux v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
Stone Cellars v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:03 am
Rba Edipresse, S.L. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
The English courts have been grappling with how far to take this. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
As Abella, J. notes in MacGyver v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
In the process, the judge rejects the double actionability rule of the English common law (par 113). [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm
English law was chosen as the proper law of the insurance contract. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
Aristotle International, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
Flintshire argued, drawing on the judgment of Lord Hailsham in London & Clydeside States Ltd v Aberdeen DC [1980] WLR 182, that this was at the lower end of the spectrum of procedural defects so as to enable the court to find that Mrs Tyrrell's review was not a nullity. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:06 am
Zevex, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:48 am
The case, incidentally, is Stevenson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
Although the issue arose as a part of Scots law, Lord Collins observed that English law is no different. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:58 am
The Texas Supreme Court, in 1983, in the case, English v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
Most media reports and early commentary on Monday’s Supreme Court decision in Holland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
In Krupski v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:02 am
Perhaps there is a lesson there for the British Government: in the unlikely event of England qualifying for the next World Cup they should send a bunch of Scotsmen to cheer the team, to avoid the national embarrassment of English hooligans shaming this sceptred isle.And so to the vuvuzela. [read post]
