Search for: "Google, Inc" Results 9401 - 9420 of 11,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Gore & Associates Inc. held to have willfully infringed rival C.R. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The claimant in Lloyd v Google sought damages on behalf of a class of more than 4 million iPhone users affected by Google’s acquisition and use of information generated by their Safari browsers. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia:  In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Lyle Denniston
   The issue in the case of Google Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:52 am by Bob Ambrogi
“Our test group preferred the uncluttered interface, the reliable and consistent search results, and how intuitive Decisis is to use (dare we say Google-like?) [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:37 am by Ron Friedmann
• Michael Mills, Co-Founder & Chief Strategy Officer, Neota Logic Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:01 am by Ed Dickson
A simple Google search for "caller ID spoofing" brings up all kinds of Adsense ads selling a wide range of caller ID spoofing services. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Romania: A number of NGOs have asked the President of Romania not to promulgate a law through which, surreptitiously, the offenses of libel and insult have been reintroduced into the Criminal Code Next week in the courts On Monday 16 December 2013, Tugendhat J will hear an application by Google Inc to set aside permission to serve out of the jurisdiction in the case of Vidal-Hall & ors v Google Inc On the same day Christopher Clarke LJ will hear a renewed… [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
With the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Google Inc. v. [read post]