Search for: "High v State"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 35,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 11:24 pm
Article 5(h) of that regulation again states that organic farming involves ‘the observance of a high level of animal welfare respecting species-specific needs”.The Court observed that the objective of the Regulations is to keep animal suffering to a minimum during the entire life of the animals, including during the slaughtering process. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm
This sentiment was supported by Justice Binnie in R. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In particular, it considered that the mark would be perceived by the relevant public as the representation of a heart and, therefore, as a reference to the fact that the services in question concern the field of cardiology.The applicant subsequently appealed to the GC claiming that, by not rightly taking into account the relevant public’s high level of attention, the Board had violated Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR together with the principles of equal treatment and sound administration.The… [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Greenway Ohio, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:12 pm
The state attorney general intends to appeal that ruling, setting up an interesting case for the state high court. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
A 1997 ruling by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Searles v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
The Court of Appeals actually considered this issue in Larsen v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
United States, could narrow the window for action on qui tam cases. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
United States, Heath v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
This was in view of Genentech's parallel applications for SPCs based on the patent filed in other EU member states. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:38 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in American Legion v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
In his report the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, presents guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms, which set out the human rights principles and standards that apply to States, international financial institutions and creditors when designing, formulating or… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 pm
This type of authoritarian overreaching to attack and dismantle the rule of law follows the pattern of authoritarian trends globally, as evidenced by V-Dem Institute’s 2018 Annual Democracy Report. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:31 pm
The state’s high court provided a broad definition of “employer” that could include the defendant. 29 N.Y.3d 174 (2017). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 10:21 am
In fact, in State v. [read post]
