Search for: "IN RE GRANT" Results 9401 - 9420 of 37,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am by Kyle Hawkins
Why not host a pre-grant symposium on either of those cases? [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 10:27 am by Milena Sterio
  75-78), and that it was not precluded through the principles of res judicata from rendering this advisory opinion (because the U.K. and Mauritius had arbitrated a slightly different dispute before an arbitral tribunal, and because the U.K. and Mauritius are not the same parties in the present request for an advisory opinion) (paras. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:44 am by Kristina Ehle and Stephan Kress
The Higher Regional Court of Munich (court of appeal) granted injunctive relief obliging “uploaded” to take down and to prevent the re-publication of the files in question but dismissed all claims for damage compensation and disclosure of user information. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
Or perhaps the argument is better put as: section 107(1) might be reasonable as an evidentiary presumption re. section 119, then once we’ve gone that far why not vastly broaden it (on the claim that this increases neutral effects between religions) by adding section 107(2).This line of argument strikes me as rather a triumph of bootstrapping. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:10 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
In his case, the defense filed something called a “motion to reconsider” This motion, if granted, means that the trial judge will re-look at some aspect or aspects of your case and consider whether changes should be made. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:58 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
They’re called to provide assistance to the Court in getting to the bottom of this mess. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm by [email protected]
He was re-indicted on the charge last year and could face the death penalty. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm by [email protected]
He was re-indicted on the charge last year and could face the death penalty. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm by Matthew Kahn
  Cummings Request   2019 03 01 EEC to Cipollone WH Re Security Clearances (PDF) 2019 03 01 EEC to Cipollone WH Re Security Clearances (Text) Cipollone Response     2019 03 04 2 Cipollone to EEC Re Security Clearances (PDF) 2019 03 04 2 Cipollone to EEC Re Security Clearances (Text) [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Catherine Glenn Foster
Planned Parenthood sought an emergency injunction in the Supreme Court, and the court granted the request 5-4 on February 7, just hours before Louisiana’s admitting privileges law would have gone into effect. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
With mounting outrage, rebuked employers and noncitizen workers are channeling Howard Beale from the venerable film Network, and screaming, “We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore! [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
With mounting outrage, rebuked employers and noncitizen workers are channeling Howard Beale from the venerable film Network, and screaming, “We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore! [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm by Daniel Hemel
Ginsburg’s majority opinion credits BNSF’s account of its own motives and grants the railroad’s wish for a tax hike. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
And if you’re the personal representative, F.S. 733.901(2) tells us that once you’re discharged, you too get to rest easy in the knowledge that you can’t be sued for anything you did during the probate proceeding. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:36 am by Lev Sugarman
 Supporting the entire R Street National Security and Cybersecurity team in developing and maintaining the highest standards of scholarship; identifying and engaging effectively with key donors and writing grant proposals; and responding quickly and insightfully to fast-changing world and national events. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am by Michael A. Conforti
., 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977)—a “drastic and extraordinary remedy,” In re Van Dusen, 654 F.3d 838, 840 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]