Search for: "In re An. C." Results 9401 - 9420 of 28,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Agence du revenu du Québec c. 9141-5315 Québec inc., 2017 QCCQ 12233 [2] Les faits sont très simples. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:27 am by BARBRI
GUEST BLOG Courtney Boykin, 2L at the University of Memphis Cecil C. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:09 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
  Citing comments on the proposed rule critical of the proposed revisions, USDA stated it is committed to “explor[ing] a full range of policy alternatives” instead, and that it will “re-engage with stakeholders to determine the most effective, science-based approach for regulating the products of modern biotechnology while protecting plant health. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Re), 2014 ONSC 5274) et s’il est question ici de la Loi sur les arrangements avec les créanciers des compagnies. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:40 am by Jeff Rasansky
If you’re even considering the idea of pursuing a birth injury malpractice claim, we know you have a lot of questions. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
In re Peter Wood, Geoffrey Dean-Smith, and Tasha Mudd, Serial No. 87022288 (October 25, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:47 am
The Plaintiff relied on the contrasting provision in the UK, namely section 72(1) of the UK Patents Act 1977 (c.37), which expressly provides that the power to revoke a patent is enjoyed by both the court and the comptroller, the UK equivalent of the Registrar. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
In re Fabtech Industries, Inc., Serial No. 86916673 (October 27, 2017) (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Comply with all program requirements and those imposed by his/her DUI Drug Court Counselor, Probation Officer and the Court;c. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
Comply with all program requirements and those imposed by his/her DUI Drug Court Counselor, Probation Officer and the Court;c. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
No Re-Verifying Current Employees  Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or that would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. * * * To be sure, AB 450 offers sops feigning fealty to federal… [read post]