Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 178,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2012, 4:54 am
The district court began its analysis by noting that "[a]s a matter of both fairness and efficiency, it seems improper to permit a defendant to force a plaintiff to choose between ambush at trial and needless preparation for a myriad of potential affirmative defenses consistent with a single broad affirmative defense in the answer. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 5:57 pm
Selvin's article, entitled "Lawyer enters plea of guilty: William Lerach pleads in a scheme to bribe plaintiffs in class-action suits for shareholders," may be found in the Business Section of the October 30, 2007 edition of the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
The court also rejected plaintiff's "nondiscrimination" RLUIPA claim for lack of proof. [read post]
26 May 2022, 5:00 am
The Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment asserting that Plaintiff was speculating as to the cause of the Plaintiff’s fall in that the Plaintiff had allegedly not provided any evidence that any alleged defect in the sidewalk was the cause of her fall. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
.), the court reversed a trial court’s decision granting the Plaintiff a new trial under a rationale that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence in a trip and fall case. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:17 am
The next morning, the Plaintiff's decedent was found unresponsive and died later that same day. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:06 am
The defendant claims that the jury’s verdict that the plaintiffs were entitled to punitive damages should have been set aside because the jury’s determination that it had fraudulently misrepresented to the plaintiffs that it was a Roman Catholic Benedictine monastery was not supported by the evidence adduced at trial. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:12 am
Similarly, the Court does not regard Plaintiff’s withdrawal of its claims on [two other] patents after receipt of the Court’s claim construction order as unreasonable. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:00 pm
.), the court granted a Defendant’s Preliminary Objections to a Plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim of a lack of informed consent relative to a laser procedure to treat the Plaintiff’s vision issues. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s 'physical presence by estoppel' argument fails to compensate for the factual shortcomings reflected in the record. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:36 am
The court overruled plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order partially striking the report of plaintiff's damages expert. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:37 am
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's infringement action for lack of personal jurisdiction because plaintiff's employees' purchase of the accused product through Amazon was sufficient to establish jurisdiction. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:19 am
Araujo ("The self-represented plaintiff...appeals from the financial orders of the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to the defendant.... [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
Following a bench trial, the court found that plaintiff's ophthalmic drug patents were invalid as obvious and found that plaintiff's evidence of commercial success and long-felt need were insufficient secondary considerations of nonobviousness to overcome the court's obviousness determination because of plaintiff's blocking patents. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:33 pm
That simple mistake here costs the plaintiff a ton of money.Not exactly the best look for plaintiff's counsel. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:21 am
§ 285 because plaintiff's litigation positions were exceptionally weak. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
The court denied summary judgement to either side on plaintiff's RLUIPA nondiscrimination and Equal Protection claims. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:57 am
By the BIA’s logic, it is far from clear if there is any evidence that Plaintiffs could produce to convince the government that they have entered a valid marriage. ... [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 4:28 pm
The court denied the plaintiff’s motion and entered the judgment of non pros. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:43 am
The appellate court found that the plaintiff’s claims were for ordinary negligence, rather than medical malpractice. [read post]
