Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 9401 - 9420 of 17,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In June, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cline v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 24 March 1999 after a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [6]), two counts of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]), and two counts of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [b] [v], [vi]). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
   But, with the count at 8 to 2, we’ll let you check out Ramirez and Alton on your own and instead focus on the good stuff. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is the defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in permitting the prosecutor to elicit expert testimony concerning the complainant's mental state. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
And, perhaps most perplexingly, counting states that confer certain rights to the people—a form of reverse federalism—is used as a one-way ratchet to ensure stronger protection of constitutionally protected liberties. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Count United States District Court for the Southern District of California Chief Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz among the fans of former Village People lead vocalist Victor Willis. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Time spent incarcerated prior to conviction cannot serve as a basis for an award as held in Fudger v State of New York. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
 There are currently 415 company-owned Steak n Shake restaurants in 15 states across the country. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Consequently, they sued, alleging minimum wage violations under state and federal law. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
They cite People v Hussein holding that each count is evaluated separately for speedy trial time as well as People v Minor and People v Clinton, cases permitting partial readiness. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am by Florian Mueller
This is now the fourth forum -- not even counting antitrust agencies in this context -- to find Motorola's FRAND positions totally out of line. [read post]