Search for: "State v House"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 28,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 9:36 am
Supreme Court, the Second Circuit did hold that the Third Amendment is incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment in a 1982 case, Engblom v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm
Easiest to imagine is a run-off system, as in France or the state of Georgia. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 12:57 am
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
Such a move would require White House approval. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, covering the Abu Khatallah verdict, the presidential transition team emails, Section 702 and ACLU v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 5:06 pm
Benalcazar v Genoa Township, OH, 2021 WL 2374260 (6th Cir. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:36 am
Ed states: According to reliable sources, the White House had settled on [Sri] Srinivasan to fill one of the two vacancies on the D.C. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:35 pm
I blogged about States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:17 pm
His opinion quoted length from the Sixth Circuit's decision in Roberts v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The House of Lords in SAAMCo v York Montague set out the principle that a wrongdoer is unlikely to be liable for all the consequences of their actions unless justified by special policy. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
" A crack-powder disparity argument is rejected under United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:00 pm
It is thus rare; it obviously takes a perceived shock to the governmental system before Article V's revision machinery is pursued to completion. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
While the Court did not disapprove of application of the Rogers test, it also did not approve of use of this speech-protective test (unlike the Congressional members of the House Judiciary Committee: see the “Balancing First Amendment concerns” section of the legislative history for the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am
Both the immediate stakes and the lineup in Murthy v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 8:31 pm
This is one of the grounds that property managers have historically used to justify filling out housing forms, and the Divisional Court recently upheld this practice in Rivera v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
In disputes between state and localities, South Bay has served as a tiebreaker. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
