Search for: "State v. House"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 28,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2016, 12:48 pm
’State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Now that we have the reports from the third and final day of the meeting in Salt Lake City of ECUSA's Executive Council, we are finally able to fill in the picture of what is going on among the Church's elected and appointed officials. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
United States and James v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am
First, whether § 51 applies to all state building codes or “only those concerning fire safety” as stated in McAllister v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
This is the case for law-making pursuant to Article I, Section 7, for admitting new states to the union pursuant to Article IV, Section 3, and even for calling a new constitutional convention pursuant to Article V. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:22 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:29 pm
See, e.g., Flanagan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm
Earlier this week, in a written statement to the House of Commons, the UK’s Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, the Rt Hon Nicky Morgan MP, announced the end of the UK’s controversial age-verification plans for online porn Part 3 of the Digital Economy Act 2017 ((hereafter: DEA), as given further effect by the Online Pornography (Commercial Basis) Regulations 2019 (SI No 23 of 2019)) seeks to regulate online… [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:01 pm
Here's an excerpt from the Georgia Supreme Court's opinion in Bell v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:47 pm
The House measure, for example, passed by a vote of 249-175. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:49 am
Watkins cited Ronnie Lee Johnson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:51 pm
Calabrese conceded that this intrusion may have been minor, but cited Boyd v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
Bacewicz. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:55 am
Facts: This case (Steigerwald v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:41 am
The Court of Appeals decision March 14th in the case of Cesar De La Rosa v. [read post]
