Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 19,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
By Mike Dorf Last week's Supreme Court decision in Perry v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:09 pm
It was found that Fanatics infringed FanFirm’s “FANATICS” trade mark; however, FanFirm’s trade mark registrations were still cancelled. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
Supreme Court justices decided O'Melvany & Myers v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:22 am
In a nutshell, the Supreme Court decision in EEOC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
It is consistent with the result of the six year old Supreme Court of Canada decision in Kraft v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
It is consistent with the result of the six year old Supreme Court of Canada decision in Kraft v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:42 am
The General Court’s conclusion is an interesting one. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am
” At Reuters’ On the Case blog (via How Appealing), Alison Frankel talks to an advocate in one of the cases on the Supreme Court’s recently postponed April argument calendar, who is still “hoping arguments will take place” because they “are a critical part of the justices’ process of deciding cases. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
Probably most striking is that in its rush to urge the Court’s engagement in the case, the dissent opens by invoking Marbury v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am
In November 2020, the Dusseldorf Regional Court decided to refer to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) two sets of legal questions: one about the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs) and another about the application of the Huawei v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 11:25 am
Cue Mr Justice Birss last week who issued his decision in the ongoing battle between Conversant v Huawei & ZTE [2020] EWHC 256. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 10:57 am
The bill responded to the Supreme Court's Miller v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
However, 44 argued cases are still pending, and will be decided before the end of the Term. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:08 pm
So they appointed this lawyer, Abe Fortas (later Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Abe Fortas, later still disgraced-former-Associate . . . ), to represent Gideon. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
In Weadick v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 8:33 am
Center v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:19 am
Dion v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ashcroft, et al., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:50 pm
Madam Justice Boyd granted the order and required Mohamed to pay Samuel’s court costs. [read post]
