Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 16,403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2021, 6:03 am
.), I think correctly, in Zabolotsky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
In a Fourth District appellate case, Krolikowski v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:36 pm
The Court did not pay much attention to this, stating simply that there was no foundation for the argument. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:21 am
Meanwhile on Monday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Snyder v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:38 am
The judge clearly states that the US Copyright Act does not extend the concept of authorship to animals and therefore Naruto is not an author. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 10:17 am
From Doe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
They asserted that the President violated the doctrine of separation of powers by strong-arming a reluctant U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
It also cited the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
If religious accommodations can be made without harm to strong state interests, RFRA pushes toward such accommodations. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Jane BambauerFor the conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First AmendmentThis is Part Two of a two-part post on the First Amendment issues raised in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
If bills were introduced to expressly extend those states’ laws to medical devices, we would vote for them.Imagine then our disappointment when we read Miller v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court decided Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
The Court stated, "Our analysis is buttressed by an examination of the legislative history behind the amendment [to CPLR 306-b]. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
Additionally, Resolution 74/247 was sponsored by more than 40 states, including several African states and India. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
While Europe imposed eligibility restrictions, the United States embraced strong patent protection. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
