Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9401 - 9420
of 13,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm
Texas: A Texas Court of Appeals, in Drennen v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:41 am
Skelly Wright and California Justice Mathew Tobriner analyzed the issue carefully in cases like Williams v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:02 pm
Moore v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
In Medina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:49 pm
In Medina v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:39 pm
On March 6, 2012, Timberridge Presbyterian Church of Atlanta filed a petition for certiorari (review) in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:41 am
Braun Medical Inc., Discovery Disputes, Discovery Sanctions, Foley & Lardner, Intellectual Property, Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, Patents, United States District Court for the Central District of California [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
Moore v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
Moore v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:00 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:40 pm
Unable to show “coercion” of their religious beliefs, the Indian plaintiffs could not rely on the First Amendment to protect their interests in aboriginal territory now owned by the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:10 am
Young v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
California, and Oregon v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
United States and its progeny. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm
Escondido, which ruled that a California statute imposing rent control on mobile home parks was not a taking, even though state law allowed tenants to renew the rent-controlled leases indefinitely even against the will of the owners. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
” The United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Hosanna-Tabor, recognizing for the first time a “ministerial exception” in the First Amendment, based on the Free Exercise and Establishment clauses. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
In Kilgore, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
” Here is the abstract: In Lyng v. [read post]
