Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 9421 - 9440
of 21,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Future-proofing can give rise to serious difficulties when the legislation furnishes the state with intrusive powers over its citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:31 pm
Instead, just include it loose, together with a completed form 1040-V (downloads as a pdf) in your envelope. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:05 am
The Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016 comes in response to the ongoing FBI v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
"Citizen's United v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:19 am
Thomas V. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
The legislation states that every person who contravenes the Safe Streets Act is liable for a fine up to $500 for a first offence. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The Court ruled in SB Liberty that Section 1363.05 of the California Civil Code (now found in Civil Code Section 4925) specifically states that members may attend an association’s board meetings. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The Court ruled in SB Liberty that Section 1363.05 of the California Civil Code (now found in Civil Code Section 4925) specifically states that members may attend an association’s board meetings. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
In Orsatti v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:19 am
In Keenan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
The Court next week will hear oral arguments in what may be the highest-stakes (at least in terms of dollars potentially at stake) case of the Term, Universal Health Services v United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:27 pm
There are significant additions to the Senate bill that are not presently contained in the House bill, including a whistleblower immunity provision, a shorter statute of limitation (3 years v. 5 years), lower exemplary damages (2 times v. 3 times actual damages), as well as increased criminal penalties for a violation of the Economic Espionage Act and it also includes portions of the DTSA as predicate offenses for the RICO Act. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:42 pm
In The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:42 pm
In Rizzuti v. [read post]
