Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York" Results 9421 - 9440 of 10,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2008, 1:26 am
State of New York NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeDeclaratory Action Against Palestinian Authority Is a 'Law Judgment'; Plaintiffs Entitled to Jury TrialStrachman v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:48 am
Mandatory arbitration for all No-fault insurance disputesAccording to the authors of an article that appeared in the June 21, 2007 edition of the New York Law Journal, the Civil Court of the City of New York and District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk Counties have been inundated with lawsuits filed by medical providers seeking reimbursement of No-Fault benefits for services rendered to injured claimants. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run May 18, 2008. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:13 am
New York City Department of Education NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeCourt Rejects Use of 'Telephonic Communication' Definition in PL §250.00[3] Instead of PL §240.30People v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:14 am
City of New YorkKINGS COUNTYAttorneys' FeesDefendant Estopped From Asserting Counsel Did NotPerform Services; Counsel Entitled to Charging LiensN.K. v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 am
You can follow the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit decision at [www.ca9.uscourts.gov]You may remember the Board of Education of the City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:17 pm
In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:16 am
New York City Bd. of Standards and Appeals, No. 129 SSM 6 "The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed, with costs, and the certified question is not answered upon the ground that it was unnecessary. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
That refusal to dismiss prompted an interlocutory appeal - and that produced the Second Circuit's latest decision, City of New York v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:27 am
As a result, the city said, the manufacturers had created a "condition that negatively affects the public health or safety" and, thus, had violated New York State's public-nuisance law. [read post]