Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 9421 - 9440 of 36,790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2019, 7:08 pm by Fauzan Siddiqui
The City’s C-Train system had 337 surveillance cameras throughout the system, with 25 near the station in question. [read post]
 The CJEU also determined that Fashion ID’s lack of access to the data is irrelevant when assessing “joint controllership” (consistent with earlier CJEU cases C-210/16 and C-25/17). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
As a general matter, such a claim could only go forward if there is an invasion (or imminent invasion) of the plaintiff's property rights, or if the case presents an analogous concrete dispute involving the plaintiff's rights or duties regarding his own property. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am by Rachel A. Howie
While the Supreme Court could determine that Canadian common law now recognises “a cause of action for damages based on alleged breaches of norms of customary international law,” this does not mean that the Court will, in its forthcoming decision on this matter, find that such has indeed occurred. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am by Rachel A. Howie
While the Supreme Court could determine that Canadian common law now recognises “a cause of action for damages based on alleged breaches of norms of customary international law,” this does not mean that the Court will, in its forthcoming decision on this matter, find that such has indeed occurred. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:10 am by Rachel A. Howie
While the Supreme Court could determine that Canadian common law now recognises “a cause of action for damages based on alleged breaches of norms of customary international law,” this does not mean that the Court will, in its forthcoming decision on this matter, find that such has indeed occurred. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:34 am
See Section 18(c) of Malawi’s Patent Act and Section 13(1)(c) of Zimbabwe’s Patent Act. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising: defendants argued that its C&D letters weren’t commercial speech or advertising for purposes of the Lanham Act and the allegedly false statements on Defendants’ website didn’t directly disparage Matonis; neither argument succeeded.Under the Gordon & Breach test (which, as a reminder, has a prong requiring “commercial competition” that doesn’t survive Lexmark, though that doesn’t matter here), these particular… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm
Where an application is accompanied by a verbal description of the sign, that description must serve to clarify the subject matter and scope of the protection sought under trade mark law; such a description cannot be inconsistent with the graphic representation of a trade mark or give rise to doubts as to the subject matter and scope of that graphic representation (Hartwall, C‑578/17)).In Heidelberger Bauchemie (C‑49/02) the CJEU held that a graphic… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:22 am by Jason Rantanen
Patent NO. 8,311,945 are invalid for failure to recite patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China.Katfriend Thomas Key reports on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:19 am by Selin Sinem Erciyas
The rights of establishments on data, which are the most valuable business products, are under protection in accordance with Article 54 and Articles 55/1(c), Article 55/1(d) and Article 55/1(e) of Turkish Commercial Code (TCC), along with the general provisions, protecting property right. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm by Vishnu Kannan
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, July 30, 2019, 10:00 a.m.: The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing titled, “Unprecedented Migration at the U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:29 am by Rob Robinson
., c/o Graubard Miller, The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10174. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Appellate Division ruled in Matter of Loren v New York City Dept. of Educ., 126 AD3d 419, an individual appointed subject to the satisfactory completion of a training period has no greater rights than those of a probationary employee.In Loren, the appointee [Trainee] had been accepted into a seven-week pre-service training period. [read post]