Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 9421 - 9440 of 55,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Do (or should) the implications of the ratification process, Texas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Murals often serve as powerful expressions of a community’s identity, history, and cultural diversity. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
We previously solicited tips about Sullivan & Cromwell M&A partner Eric Krautheimer, of Aaron Charney v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
As noted in my preview last week, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Stainless USA is the Supreme Court’s first arbitration case of the 2019 term. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
This case is a good cautionary tale of how a descriptive trademark can be turned into an unduly powerful weapon that ultimately hurts consumers. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I agree with Rick’s take on the oral argument in Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:10 am by Christopher G. Hill
  Despite the power of a properly perfected and enforced mechanic’s lien (and the fact that the end result of a full mechanic’s lien suit that remains unsettled is in fact a foreclosure), a recent case in the Eastern District of Virginia, Weinberg v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 11:53 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
This would result in significant loss in power generation and revenue for downstream N-JHEP of Pakistan and any other future power project. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
” The powerful dissent of Justice Alito (including an Appendix summarising the animal cruelty laws in each state) is also worth reading. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is my view that RFRA is unconstitutional in all of its applications, not simply as applied to state laws, because it violates the separation of powers principle embodied in the Constitution, Article V’s constitutional amendment procedures, and the principle of separation of church and state. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:50 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In particular a right to commit what would otherwise be a tort may be implied if a statutory power was incapable of being exercised or a statutory duty was incapable of being performed without doing the act in question. [read post]