Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 9421 - 9440
of 10,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 1:43 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Bridge v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
Ed. 2d 640 (1981); see also United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:04 am
The highly visible challenge to Congress’ renewal of the law that requires nine states and parts of seven others to get Washington clearance before they change election laws probably will not develop fast enough to have an impact in this year’s election campaign. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
Wiretap guru Judge Betty Fletcher (left) brings us a disappointing Title III decision this week in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
: (Spicy IP) Events 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 13-14 June: Centre for European Economic Research conference on ‘The… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:11 am
SMITHIn September 2003, the United States Congress unanimously passed the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA). [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
We are asked to hold that it violates the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:51 am
”The Malbco and Aecon rulings, like HSS Enterprises, are not binding on state courts in Washington. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Humphries and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 5-7 June: European research and innovation exhibition – Paris: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with… [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
COMPLEX TECH: If your firm doesn't understand technology, digital redaction disasters are inevitable
28 May 2008, 1:30 pm
For example, General Order 08-02, issued by the United States District Court, Central District of California, requires redaction to protect "sensitive and private information. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:17 am
" In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:25 am
George Washington Penson, III ("Penson") appeals his sentence and the judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. [read post]
