Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 9421 - 9440
of 12,159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:00 am
As my Canadian friends point out, the seriously ill get health care and the less seriously ill wait a few weeks. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
"A discretionary change of venue under CPLR 510 (3) is addressed to the convenience of nonparty witnesses" (State of New York v Quintal, Inc., ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2010 NY Slip Op 09061 [2010] [emphasis added and citations omitted]; see State of New York v Slezak Petr. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about a fascinating Fourth Amendment district court decision involving how the border search exception applies to computers, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
R (Ali Zaki Mousa) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
” Lopez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm
He’s saying he didn’t want to be President of the United States so he could stay home and be “Daddy”? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 12:49 pm
See Wright v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:16 am
See State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:54 pm
In the appointment letter, Kosinki designates Burns to “perform the duties of United States District Judge temporarily for the District of Arizona for the specific case United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm
Teleflex and Bilski v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am
Varnum When the Iowa Supreme Court decided the Varnum v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
While waiting for a Supreme Court decision on whether to hear the case MacDonald is subject to Jessica’s Law. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:56 am
In that case (David v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:03 pm
Huff v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
Aronson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
McKaig v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm
In Dothard v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:17 am
Supreme Court ruled in Olmstead v. [read post]
