Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 9441 - 9460 of 32,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2019, 11:20 am by Stuart Kaplow
On sine die, when the legislature adjourned at midnight on the 90th day, on April 8, 2019, a total of 864 bills and 2 resolutions passed both chambers. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:14 pm by Rachel Casper
Does the password manager have to automatically fill in website forms for login? [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:23 am by Robert Kampen
Under the proposed rule, an 8(a) participant does not have an employee count restriction, as is the case with SBA’s regulation. 8(a) companies, however, should still assume that they must fall beneath 500 employees to count as nonmanufacturers: the SBA’s regulation in 13 C.F.R. 121.406(b)(1) imposes this requirement. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Michael Connell
The summary does not provide much detail, but this proposal for a payment-in-lieu regime has met with strong condemnation from multiple environmental advocacy groups who oppose any payment-in-lieu regime that will simply make it easier for industry/development proponents to harm species at risk and damage or destroy their habitats (see Recommendation 8 from Ontario Nature et al., Comments on the Review of the ESA). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court’s Decision in Dames & Moore v Regan By a vote of 8-1, the Supreme Court held that the President acted within his authority. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
So instead, let me say a little bit about one case the court has repeatedly rescheduled and that has garnered some attention: Doe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by INFORRM
The Defendant denied that the Claimants had a reasonable expectation of privacy, alternatively that, if the Claimants’ Article 8 rights were sufficiently engaged, they were outweighed by the Defendant’s right to freedom of expression given the public interest in the matter. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:23 am by Stephen Sachs
The Nexus Act does some of this work for us, providing a safe harbor for certain applications even after a successful constitutional challenge to others. 8. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:28 am by Giesela Ruehl
So far, an abuse of EU law argument in the context of Brussels I has been only made in relation to Article 8(1) of Brussels I (former Article 6(1)), which permits the joining of connected claims against persons domiciled in different Member States in one jurisdiction to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am by Jan von Hein
The Court does not, however, even mention the necessity of the agreement of the child, an omission which must be criticised. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 1:48 am by Florian Mueller
Even France is far behind; Macron's "Startup Nation" is a case of all hat and no cattle, like pretty much everything he does and wants. [read post]