Search for: "Doe Associations 1-10" Results 9441 - 9460 of 12,257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
” ** This option was set out in the initial collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the State as an employer and the Civil Service Employees Association with respect to employees in negotiating units represented by CSEA. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Knopf
Institutions who resist providing information should be reminded of the Board’s powers pursuant to subsection 66.7(1) of the Copyright Act.Q. 10/10, 49/50, 88/89, 103/104: the questions as reformulated shall be answered. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:34 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
Tomassi Law Associates, LLC www.attorney-ri.com 1-888-RI-LAWLINEIts not the vertiginous heels that I cant keep my eyes off, nor the super-mafioso shades, not even the see-through catsuit. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Christa Culver
CourtDocket: 10-738Issue(s): (1) Whether a sentencing court, confronted with the task of determining victims’ losses pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, may deny restitution to the victims because it believes that the victims might be able to recoup their losses in an alternative forum [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:23 am by azatty
The School received full approval from the American Bar Association in June 2010. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm by Tom Lamb
CASE SUMMARY: A 60-year-old female with type 2 diabetes presented with a 16-hour history of mid-epigastric pain 3 weeks after treatment was changed from exenatide 10 ? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:08 am by Luke Green
Rule 9j-1 also incorporates additional language that Rule 10b-5 does not, but that has been addressed in case law interpreting Rule 10b-5. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
” On 16 December 2008, the Secretary of State announced that children under the age of 10 would be removed from the DNA database. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am by Kara OBrien
Williams, dated April 20, 2011 (the “April 20 Letter”), the FPPC stated that the law does not apply retroactively to contracts that an investment adviser had with a California state pension plan before the law took effect on January 1, 2011. [read post]