Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 12,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 7:23 am
According to the lawsuit, filed by lawyers representing Gabbard’s campaign Tulsi Now Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
NLRB Law Memo 04/10/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
24 May 2019, 9:41 am
This first report will provide an executive summary by discussing (a) the overall purpose and (b) the main activities of an IT Staffing and Consulting firm. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
Brown Express, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
John Fund, Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:44 am
Last week, PetroChina International (America), Inc., an American subsidiary of the Chinese company, became the first defendant to make an appearance in any of these cases. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Electrical Contractors) __________________ “[T]he aims and objectives of patent and antitrust laws may seem, at first glance, wholly at odds. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
Know your judge is the first rule of ADA defense. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
, Inc., Court of Chancery C.A. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Introduction On August 31, 2009, The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) and Marvel Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
Full Federal Court issues ruling in Hansen Beverage Company v Bickford’s (Australia) Pty Ltd (IP Down Under) Elvis Presley Enterprises opposition to Elvis Jelcic’s application to register ElvisFinance for financial services fails (IPKat) Canada Canada-EU Free Trade Agreement – consultation deadline 20 January 2009 (Excess Copyright) China Coming up: China-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement (IP Dragon) USTR releases 2008 report on China’s… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Sellers need to consider the number of participants and the quality of, and variance between, bidders' initial proposals before deciding whether to permit one or more first round participants to "sharpen their pencils" and submit a revised proposal (or, conversely, whether to focus efforts on completing a definitive transaction agreement with a single standout bidder). [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
"[18] Not only would this discourage challengers from initiating a proxy contest in the first place, but provides little justification for amending the Rule. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
Invariably, the board members who also compete in the market eventually use their power on the board to benefit their own pecuniary interests: Licensing Requirements. . [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Call it the “First-Period Solution” to the Last-Period Problem; this non-legal force is present in stock-for-stock deals and absent in cash mergers, and the First-Period Solution might obviate the need for Revlon scrutiny in stock-for-stock mergers.[13] Of course, the degree to which the proposed First Period Solution protects target stockholders is unkn [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
These transactions need to be objectively “fair” to the corporation and its shareholders; such transactions must not benefit (or appear to benefit) the counter party to the detriment of the corporation or its shareholders. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
The first two elements comprise the actus reus, while the final element is the mens rea. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
The first decision for owners to make is who will get a chance to purchase the business interest? [read post]
