Search for: "H. C" Results 9441 - 9460 of 12,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
IBM and Samsung patent licensing deal (IAM) Canada Nortel bond yields rise as investors await patent auction news (IAM) (IP finance) Canadian Bar Association brief on Bill C-32 now available (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Consumers’ rights in copyrighted works: a play back for balance on Bill C-32 ‘trio provisions’ (IP Osgoode) Canadian Council of Archives on C-32: Digital lock rules disastrous for long-term access (Michael Geist) China What is the… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:11 pm by Brian Shiffrin
[h]aving been arrested for, charged with or convicted of a class A or class B felony, he [or she] escapes from custody . . . . [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:11 pm
Accordingly, the Ministry has issued directions through General Circular No. 2/2011 for this purpose.The conditions to be met by the companies to avail the exemption are set out below:-(i) The Board of directors of the company has by resolution given consent for not attaching the balance sheet of the subsidiary concerned;(ii) The company shall present in the annual report, the consolidated financial statements of holding company and all subsidiaries duly audited by its statutory… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Judicial-Conduct Rule 3(h)(2); see also In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct, 404 F.3d at 697–98. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:14 am by Juana Vasella
Es widerspricht daher der Gesetzessystematik, vor allem aber Sinn und Zweck des Jugendstrafrechts, Untersuchungshaft und vorsorgliche Schutzmassnahmen im vorliegenden Zusammenhang gleich zu behandeln.Mit Verweis auf Art. 32 JStG (Zusammentreffen von Schutzmassnahmen und Freiheitsentzug), der auch bei vorsorglich angeordneten Schutzmassnahmen anwendbar ist, hält das Bundesgericht fest:1.6.2 […] Aus Abs. 3 ergibt sich somit, dass die aufgehobene Unterbringung nicht automatisch an… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm by South Florida Lawyers
Second, we ask whether the term “joint proposal” in Rule 1.442(c)(3) applies to cases where acceptance of the offer is conditioned upon dismissal with prejudice of an offeree’s claims against an offeror and a third party. [read post]