Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 29,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2008, 3:50 pm
For example, I could explain why I think that the majority view in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:13 pm
If a dependent spouse starts living with an unrelated adult after the divorce, is that enough to terminate the supporting spouse’s alimony obligation? [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:27 am
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (government invited public recreational boaters to enter a private lagoon) (a case litigated by my Damon Key colleagues Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert, by the way), Loretto v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:35 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:25 am
The case, Maynard v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 6:03 am
Sixty-eight years ago, in Watts v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 12:29 pm
Several weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
Garrison was charged with and convicted of violating state drug laws based on what they found in his apartment. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Some people equate this figure with the “poverty line” although Statistics Canada expressly states that this is not a measure of poverty. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
” Brockman offered Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
But every originalist–indeed every living constitutionist–understands that neither the Free Exercise Clause nor the Establishment Clause originally applied to the states at all. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 12:22 pm
Trump’s appointments created the Court that overruled Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
Obama’s trip was to encourage young people living in South Africa and Botswana to get involved in national affairs. [read post]
Judicial Watch Files New Court Brief in Legal Pursuit of Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s Security Detail
2 Aug 2010, 11:03 am
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed a new memorandum with the Superior Court for the State of Arizona in its legal pursuit of documents related to Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s taxpayer-funded security detail (Judicial Watch, Inc. v City of Phoenix (Civil Action CV2010-015452)). [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:13 am
An example of the phenomenon is State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
Further, these actions were reasonable under the factors in Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am
Supreme Court: Abbott v. [read post]
