Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 19,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
Using consultations ‘they kicked the issue into the long grass for five years’. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
This makes for long and sometimes ponderous opinions. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:46 pm
They additionally would be able to convey their weapons to shooting contests and competitions, so long as it’s a legitimate and lawful. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:40 pm
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Davis and his coauthors situate their argument for antiracist antitrust law in the context of Cung Le v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:38 pm
Astoundingly, begging in a public place (MCL 750.167(1)(h)) also warrants life-long sex offender registration. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:43 am
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm
Gimenez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm
The court notes that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of the commission of a specific crime is sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest as also ruled in People v Lee, Kramer v City of New York and People v Gonzalez. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 7:07 am
Patterson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:10 pm
Add to that the impact of the R. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:23 am
Freecycle Network, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:31 pm
As many of you know, the Supreme Court just shot down the student-loan forgiveness plan in Biden v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:07 pm
Judge Walton, however, countered: “What you’re saying is that there are a lot of people Congress was trying to reach [in the 9/11 Resolution in 2001] who wouldn’t be. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Under Title VII, religious objectors can get exemptions from generally applicable work rules, but only so long as the exceptions don't create an "undue hardship" to the employer, which is to say so long as they impose only "de minimis costs. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
Among other problems were dealing with US v UK spelling differences. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
