Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 13,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 12:02 pm
In the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
The court’s decision, Rice v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:53 am
That was January, 1996, and the decision was United State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am
Florida, the follow-up case to Atkins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
I’ll leave it to others to flesh out some of the socio/political objections (of which there are many), but I’d like to look at some of the legal implications. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In Alabama v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 7:56 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court decided to hear NCAA v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:49 pm
Supreme Court in Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
OF COURSE it’s moderated – you people are not responsible for any legal actions, the paper is… think before you ink“. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
However, during the Winter 2020 holidays, many Canadians were incensed by the revelation that several politicians, from many different political parties, had engaged in international travel. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 7:06 pm
Tuan's Open Letter 中大校長段崇智教授公開信 pp. 233-246 Chapter 19: Sunday, October 20, 2019 Shirley Ze Yu on Hong Kong and the Construction of Post-Global Empire pp. 247-254 Chapter 20 Monday 18 November 2019 Open-Shut (bai he 稗閤) Strategies: 习近平;止暴制乱… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
The ICO has issued a reprimand to the Labour Party for repeatedly failing to respond to people who asked what personal information the party held on them – known as a subject access request. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 11:54 pm
Supreme Court decision in NAACP v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004) Danie [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:24 am
I agree with the majority, but government officials should also stop treating Section 230 like a political football. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 20-21 January 2011… [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Abortion may be central to Supreme Court politics, but it's outside our academic specialties, and usually too sensitive a topic for the faculty lounge. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
