Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 24,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2009, 3:01 am
It then places the litigation in the larger context of the debate regarding the implementation of the United States' international obligations, examining: from a separation-of-powers perspective, the proper role of each branch of the federal government; and from a federalism perspective, the interplay between the state and federal governments. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 11:03 am
Wheeler and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:01 am
United Ins. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
United States, et al. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:05 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm
Commentary: The ruling in the Bancorp case will place many financial patents at risk. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Nebraska Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains a list of State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:18 pm
Marion County, upholding a stringent state voter ID law, and Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
Although for many years there have been grey market problems in the United States with electronics and cameras, it was not a big problem with software. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 4:26 pm
See United Food Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:32 pm
” Breyer added: “Explain it to me how your test does not make this statute potentially criminalizing 100 million workers in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:00 am
The European Court in M.S. v United Kingdom has not carved out a right to treatment; it has extended the right to be protected from indignity in detention that is already well-recognised in its jurisprudence (Keenan v United Kingdom). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:30 pm
A photographer and a photo agency are teaming up to restart a legal war against online linking in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
Post by Alex Christian The 1996 United States Supreme Court decision in Markman v. [read post]
