Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 9461 - 9480 of 32,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Josh Blackman
I think OLC would deem this provision unconstitutional. 8 U.S.C. 1152(a) Section 2 of the bill would modify 8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(1)(A). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
This does not mean, however, that a state cannot rank in the top 10 while still levying all the major taxes. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:59 pm by Lyle Roberts
., 8 F. 4th 592 (7th Cir. 2021) – does not disappoint. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:39 am
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to an individual operating a truck: (1) in a parade; or (2) on a farm in connection with agricultural pursuits that are usual and normal to the farming operation, as set forth in IC 9-29-5-13(b)(2).That language was deleted when the bill was in Senate committee; it did not become law. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:18 am by Sam Hasler
Frequency of itemized billing.8.under what circumstances the lawyer may seek to withdraw from the case and the attorney’s right to seek a charging lien.9. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:51 pm by admin
 The automatic stay also does not prevent the post-petition collection of Domestic Support Obligations such as alimony or child support. 1) From any property belonging to the debtor, providing that the bankruptcy estate does not also have an interest in said property, 2) Wage deduction orders created by a statute or judicial or administrative order,  3) From the interception of debtor’s federal or state income tax refunds, or  4) From the withholding,… [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:34 pm by Amanda L. Wait and Matthew W. Modell
Chiefly, the court said that Amazon Business (1) lacks RFP experience; (2) has no commitment to guaranteed pricing; (3) lacks the ability to control third-party price and delivery; (4) does not have the ability to provide customer-specific pricing; (5) lacks dedicated customer service agents for large business customers; (6) does not do desktop delivery; (7) does not provide detailed utilization and invoice reports; and (8) lacks product variety and… [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Gene Quinn
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007), decided 8-1 with only Justice Thomas dissenting: the Court decided that the case or controversy requirement of the Constitution did not require a licensee to breach a license agreement in order to challenge the validity of a patent. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:03 pm by Mark Ashton
The 3-1-1 decision issued on December 29, 2015 does not establish a bright line test. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am by fjhinojosa
Augustine, And When Does The Black Church Get Political? [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:03 pm by Jason Rantanen
  The BPAI disagreed with the Examiner’s basis for rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-8, and 10-12, but nevertheless concluded that these claims were invalid in light of prior art. [read post]