Search for: "Daily v. Daily" Results 9461 - 9480 of 14,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Quick answer: no” [David Henderson; WSJ/@scottlincicome on seasonal pool-supply company] Hillary Clinton and the Market Basket Stores myth [James Taranto] Labor Department proposes tightening regulation of retirement financial advisers [Kenneth Bentsen, The Hill] Proposed: “well-orchestrated” state ballot initiatives aimed at overturning employment at will [Rand Wilson, Workplace Fairness] My view: “Everybody wins with at-will employment” [Ethan Blevins, Pacific… [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 7:59 am by James Romoser
Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court Allows Extension for Mail-In Ballots in Pennsylvania (Jess Bravin & Brent Kendall, The Wall Street Journal) In a 4–4 Split, the Supreme Court Lets Pennsylvania Make Voting Easier — for Now (Richard Hasen, Slate) We’re Living in the Shadows of a Bush v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm by admin
Supreme Court Decisions Washington Post   Quoting and linking to our Wex definition of defamation Then, there’s the little guys: Bangor Daily News Linking to a section of federal labor law Picayune Item Quoting the federal definition of an “open alcoholic beverage container” Rome (Ga) News Tribune Linking to our Bulletin Preview of Foster v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 10:21 am by admin
Sources: New York Daily News – Wrestling sisters Brittany and Brienna Delgado nab fleeing hit-and-run suspect in Oklahoma City Huffington Post – Brittany Delgado, Brienna Delgado, Subdue Hit And Run Driver With Wrestling Moves (VIDEO) Examiner – Grrl power: Oklahoma City Univ. women wrestlers take down hit-and-run driver *v [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The brokers initially succeeded in obtaining conditional certification of their misclassification claims under the relatively lenient FLSA standard in Griffith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]