Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 9461 - 9480
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
Arizona v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 3:18 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
., the fact that Monster's marks are arbitrary (and hence entitled to a greater degree of protection), the fact that the goods are inexpensive and hence that customers are likely not to devote a great deal of care to their selection, and (significantly) the fact that there is evidence of actual confusion. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:40 pm
By a 5-4 vote, the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:44 am
(Lee)(Jolly): securities fraud claim in connection with squeeze out merger, breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, dissenters' rights. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:06 pm
Rather, the military judge is required to deal with potential issues raised during the providence inquiry or trial that indicate an inconsistency or a defense. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:04 am
© 580 of 2003, Common Cause v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:29 am
Agency v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 3:05 am
Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
(David Post) The Second Circuit has finally released its long-awaited decision in the appeal of the Viacom v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Today's 38-page COA opinion in the case of City of East Chicago, Indiana v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 7:27 pm
Ardis Health, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 3:00 pm
I had posted about how an Alberta judge had found in Alberta (Human Rights and Citizenship Commission) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:24 am
On September 22, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its decision in Lamont Community Church v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to hear argument in Vance v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:34 am
"Second, the case deals with the admissibility of statements in medical records. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:41 pm
A helpful reader informed me that the Third Circuit yesterday granted rehearing en banc in US v. [read post]
